jonty_11
02-06 02:20 PM
u can retain PD only if u have Labor and I140 approved from Old Company.
When u file I-140 with new company - u dislcose intent to retain old PD as u submit copy of approved I-140 (u got with old Comapny)
When u file I-140 with new company - u dislcose intent to retain old PD as u submit copy of approved I-140 (u got with old Comapny)
wallpaper Lady Gaga#39;s Videos Before She
pointlesswait
03-03 05:34 PM
i think majority of the Eb2 filings are under audit..
i ran my first ad..this sunday..and my lawyer didnt say a thing abt change in perm process.. but he did mention that Eb2 are being scrutinized more.
i think ur desi consultant is afraid of being under the scanner ! ;)
i ran my first ad..this sunday..and my lawyer didnt say a thing abt change in perm process.. but he did mention that Eb2 are being scrutinized more.
i think ur desi consultant is afraid of being under the scanner ! ;)
mambarg
08-31 06:55 PM
So frustrating. It is no in press release section
People are supposed to hack the site to get this information.
Pitty
People are supposed to hack the site to get this information.
Pitty
2011 Lady Gaga before she was
ps57002
07-24 06:21 PM
I know govt said anything regarding labor certifications etc are now only to be paid by employer...
what about fees related to extensions of h1 b? can i still pay for it or it's employer who has to pay...cause knowing my employer i know they won't want to pay and i wonder what options i have.
what about fees related to extensions of h1 b? can i still pay for it or it's employer who has to pay...cause knowing my employer i know they won't want to pay and i wonder what options i have.
more...
shvinod
05-27 04:06 PM
Thanks for the suggestions. I called in the National Service Center and put in a request to expedite the case. Got an email that I can try to visit the local ASC and see if they can collect the biometric. We visited the local ASC today and the were kind enough to collect the Biometric. I hope we get the AP before the departure date..
snhn
07-14 03:59 PM
mine was 3 years ago. i got a respond from them in favor of me in about a month. however USCIS status page still shows as pending. Go figure.
more...
hibworker
03-18 01:05 AM
My H1 Extension approved from Sept'2010 - Dec 2012. LCA shows same dates and the salary shown is $5500 PM ($66000 P.A)
However recently, i noticed that i am receiving $5373(instead of $5500) per month since Sept'2010 till date.
I informed to my employer and he is willing to increase the pay from March.
Is it possible to correct it from March payroll.
Please advise.
Regards,
Sunshine
The employer should correct it from March and pay the 6 months difference as bonus. At end of year your salary should be at least equal to LCA.
However recently, i noticed that i am receiving $5373(instead of $5500) per month since Sept'2010 till date.
I informed to my employer and he is willing to increase the pay from March.
Is it possible to correct it from March payroll.
Please advise.
Regards,
Sunshine
The employer should correct it from March and pay the 6 months difference as bonus. At end of year your salary should be at least equal to LCA.
2010 Lady Gaga has become famous
gotgc?
09-18 12:52 PM
Thanks a lot..for your response.
more...
webm
10-28 09:15 AM
Do you get I-94 if you travel and entering US on AP--YES ?
If yes what is end date on I-94 and how you get extention of I-94 for that I-94 ?--You will be on AOS status after I-94 expires also you can still get H1 extension and obtain new I-94,continue renewing EAD/AP
see the resp in bold...
If yes what is end date on I-94 and how you get extention of I-94 for that I-94 ?--You will be on AOS status after I-94 expires also you can still get H1 extension and obtain new I-94,continue renewing EAD/AP
see the resp in bold...
hair I think you all know Lady Gaga
rbharol
04-07 10:05 PM
Please do not start meaningless threads.
Moderators Please delete this thread.
Moderators Please delete this thread.
more...
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:50 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEietSywkoIA35jDqLgtqyz48IKVes9Hlil2L8Bl4vCq0-pzoIpJB6qeJD0LWoeKnqlY4Ule5QYPOkYK6AhI9ptsm78VU1BIw8DgybWOel_nqxXNS2nCnPo6ean5xDyXneEjlVOE6zSYe4I/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEietSywkoIA35jDqLgtqyz48IKVes9Hlil2L8Bl4vCq0-pzoIpJB6qeJD0LWoeKnqlY4Ule5QYPOkYK6AhI9ptsm78VU1BIw8DgybWOel_nqxXNS2nCnPo6ean5xDyXneEjlVOE6zSYe4I/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEietSywkoIA35jDqLgtqyz48IKVes9Hlil2L8Bl4vCq0-pzoIpJB6qeJD0LWoeKnqlY4Ule5QYPOkYK6AhI9ptsm78VU1BIw8DgybWOel_nqxXNS2nCnPo6ean5xDyXneEjlVOE6zSYe4I/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEietSywkoIA35jDqLgtqyz48IKVes9Hlil2L8Bl4vCq0-pzoIpJB6qeJD0LWoeKnqlY4Ule5QYPOkYK6AhI9ptsm78VU1BIw8DgybWOel_nqxXNS2nCnPo6ean5xDyXneEjlVOE6zSYe4I/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
hot efore she was famous
sweet_jungle
10-14 04:33 AM
This is getting ridiculous...losing my patience
I think a controlled slow movement is good at the beginning of the year. Last year they had made, for example, EB2 India as April 2004 but they had to make it U after 1st quarter.
So, a controlled slow movement will leave to more un-used numbers in the 3rd quarter when they will then be forced to make big jumps in dates to use up annual visa numbers
I think a controlled slow movement is good at the beginning of the year. Last year they had made, for example, EB2 India as April 2004 but they had to make it U after 1st quarter.
So, a controlled slow movement will leave to more un-used numbers in the 3rd quarter when they will then be forced to make big jumps in dates to use up annual visa numbers
more...
house pictures Before she was a
redgreen
10-14 01:47 PM
It is mentioned by many that PD should be current at the time of GC approval. Is that right?
I know people from India who got their GC approved when their PD is not current.
One can check this easily in looking for I-485 approvals to people from India who submitted their applications concurrently in EB2 category after say april 2004. Disregard the cases which got approved in July 2007. Still there are many cases remaining invalidating the 'rule'!
I know people from India who got their GC approved when their PD is not current.
One can check this easily in looking for I-485 approvals to people from India who submitted their applications concurrently in EB2 category after say april 2004. Disregard the cases which got approved in July 2007. Still there are many cases remaining invalidating the 'rule'!
tattoo +lady+gaga+efore+she+was+
pou-pou
04-14 08:17 AM
have to love that first one :love:
more...
pictures Picture of Lady Gaga before
indyanguy
11-19 08:46 PM
In most of the job boards, we see the following employment types:
1. Full Time (this I understand :))
2. Contract - Corp 2 Corp
3. Contract - Independent
4. Contract - W2
5. Contract to Hire - Corp 2 Corp/W2/Independent.
Can someone explain to me what these mean?
What are the differences with taxation perspective?
For someone on EAD, (for AC21), which employment type(s) are preferred?
Thanks!
1. Full Time (this I understand :))
2. Contract - Corp 2 Corp
3. Contract - Independent
4. Contract - W2
5. Contract to Hire - Corp 2 Corp/W2/Independent.
Can someone explain to me what these mean?
What are the differences with taxation perspective?
For someone on EAD, (for AC21), which employment type(s) are preferred?
Thanks!
dresses Lady Gaga Before She Was
missedthecut
05-03 05:26 PM
Hi,
I had my last name misspelled and middle name missing on my filed perm labor application and it was filed on 12/12/2007. It was selected for audit in Feb 2008 and have not received any update until now. Can this error in my name be corrected on my application. Please advice.
I had my last name misspelled and middle name missing on my filed perm labor application and it was filed on 12/12/2007. It was selected for audit in Feb 2008 and have not received any update until now. Can this error in my name be corrected on my application. Please advice.
more...
makeup Madonna Before She Was Famous:
CantLeaveAmerica
04-09 01:08 PM
I dont think it is mandatory..please look at this:
Employmentbased
Criteria
The adjudicating officer must determine whether the employment-based
I-485 meets waiver of interview criteria set forth below.
Employment-based:
? The principal applicant is employed by the same petitioner who submitted
the approved underlying employment-based visa petition.
? The principal applicant has been interviewed in the course of an
investigation or field examination, and the adjudicating examiner
determines that further interview of the applicant is unnecessary.
? The principal applicant has been approved as an alien of extraordinary
ability or alien of exceptional ability and is otherwise eligible for
adjustment of status.
? The principal applicant has been approved as an outstanding professor or
researcher, or a multinational executive/manager and has a continuing
offer of employment from the same petitioner who submitted the
underlying approved petition.
? Adjustment applicants who received national interest waivers based on
performing primary medical care to a medically under-served area must
demonstrate that they intend to continue according to the terms and
conditions of the underlying petition.
Other:
? Sufficient evidence is contained in the record to support a denial of the
adjustment of status application. For example, if an I-485 that should
have been rejected at Visa Screening/INS Review was accepted in error, a
denial would be processed by the adjudicating officer.
Employmentbased
Criteria
The adjudicating officer must determine whether the employment-based
I-485 meets waiver of interview criteria set forth below.
Employment-based:
? The principal applicant is employed by the same petitioner who submitted
the approved underlying employment-based visa petition.
? The principal applicant has been interviewed in the course of an
investigation or field examination, and the adjudicating examiner
determines that further interview of the applicant is unnecessary.
? The principal applicant has been approved as an alien of extraordinary
ability or alien of exceptional ability and is otherwise eligible for
adjustment of status.
? The principal applicant has been approved as an outstanding professor or
researcher, or a multinational executive/manager and has a continuing
offer of employment from the same petitioner who submitted the
underlying approved petition.
? Adjustment applicants who received national interest waivers based on
performing primary medical care to a medically under-served area must
demonstrate that they intend to continue according to the terms and
conditions of the underlying petition.
Other:
? Sufficient evidence is contained in the record to support a denial of the
adjustment of status application. For example, if an I-485 that should
have been rejected at Visa Screening/INS Review was accepted in error, a
denial would be processed by the adjudicating officer.
girlfriend Lady Gaga Before She Was
prom2
07-26 01:49 PM
:
TSC last Receipts:
RD ---- ND
06/20 07/23
06/21 07/20
06/19 07/20
06/19 07/20
06/21 07/19
06/21 07/19
06/18 07/19
06/21 07/19
06/14 07/19
06/21 07/19
NSC last Receipts
RD ---- ND
06/24 07/26
06/29 07/24
06/04 07/23
06/26 07/23
06/27 07/23
06/27 07/23
06/25 07/20
06/26 07/20
06/26 07/20
06/18 07/20
06/04 07/20
TSC last Receipts:
RD ---- ND
06/20 07/23
06/21 07/20
06/19 07/20
06/19 07/20
06/21 07/19
06/21 07/19
06/18 07/19
06/21 07/19
06/14 07/19
06/21 07/19
NSC last Receipts
RD ---- ND
06/24 07/26
06/29 07/24
06/04 07/23
06/26 07/23
06/27 07/23
06/27 07/23
06/25 07/20
06/26 07/20
06/26 07/20
06/18 07/20
06/04 07/20
hairstyles Of Lady Gaga Before She
EndlessWait
06-21 03:56 PM
Hi,
Please help me with my situation below:
1) Got laid off from company A (they haven't cancelled my H1).
2) Got my H1B transferred to company B (this H1B transfer has not yet been approved). I did not work for them.
3) I did premium processing for H1B transfer for company C and got it approved. I haven't started working for them.
4) Now I have decided to work for company D. They are ready to do my H1B transfer.
Will that be a problem or do I have to go with company C? I do not have paystubs from company B and C. If I have to reenter US, will that be a problem? Please help me out.
file it immediately and start working for C. If there is an RFE, it'd take few months by that time you just send ur current pay stubs. INS is generally flexible for a month or so..act fast
Please help me with my situation below:
1) Got laid off from company A (they haven't cancelled my H1).
2) Got my H1B transferred to company B (this H1B transfer has not yet been approved). I did not work for them.
3) I did premium processing for H1B transfer for company C and got it approved. I haven't started working for them.
4) Now I have decided to work for company D. They are ready to do my H1B transfer.
Will that be a problem or do I have to go with company C? I do not have paystubs from company B and C. If I have to reenter US, will that be a problem? Please help me out.
file it immediately and start working for C. If there is an RFE, it'd take few months by that time you just send ur current pay stubs. INS is generally flexible for a month or so..act fast
bestin
09-28 06:53 AM
Finally,my attorney has sent me a mail that the cheques were encashed on Sep27th morning.Any idea when will be the finger printing as i am planning to goto India in early Nov.
imechanix
03-03 03:43 PM
Similar to touch, smell, taste of freedom! I guess.
No comments:
Post a Comment